It will take time but that word describes the deranged non objective mindset that puts all logic aside, putting the topic of the cartels on the table and it's impact on border communities and surroundings in America would trigger an entirely different retort due to the Middle Eastern Israel derangement Factor.
So many aspects of magic Jew thinking here on substack that defy rational logic ² by the minute.
All the wars fought for Israel and the famous quote of the 7 nation's must go by this date by the Lefty general Wesley Clark
I'd coined the term Islamic deflectionist after observing so many conversations about islamism changing to but what about the Jews, in my mind I speculated that as The barbarians were at the gates of Vienna they were asking but what about the Jews.
This is a superb article, if I could give it multiple “likes” I would!! Besides Panicans, I do think we got a few old-school antisemites in that anti-bombing of Iran camp too but why quibble over numbers?
You do confuse empire with security and assume that America's safety hinges on perpetual intervention. It’s not “moral absolutism” to question entangling the U.S. in foreign conflicts with no constitutional declaration of war and no direct threat to the homeland; it’s basic republican principle. Strategic strikes, no matter how “limited,” invite retaliation, mission creep, and blowback, something libertarians learned the hard way from Bush’s wars, which this piece conveniently glosses over. What you label as “paralysis” is actually prudence. A government that can’t balance its own checkbook has no business playing world police.
It will take time but that word describes the deranged non objective mindset that puts all logic aside, putting the topic of the cartels on the table and it's impact on border communities and surroundings in America would trigger an entirely different retort due to the Middle Eastern Israel derangement Factor.
So many aspects of magic Jew thinking here on substack that defy rational logic ² by the minute.
All the wars fought for Israel and the famous quote of the 7 nation's must go by this date by the Lefty general Wesley Clark
I'd coined the term Islamic deflectionist after observing so many conversations about islamism changing to but what about the Jews, in my mind I speculated that as The barbarians were at the gates of Vienna they were asking but what about the Jews.
Excellent piece, ✌️
restacked
Phenomenal thought piece!
This is a superb article, if I could give it multiple “likes” I would!! Besides Panicans, I do think we got a few old-school antisemites in that anti-bombing of Iran camp too but why quibble over numbers?
Great post, thanks! There is a closely related but wider concept of паникёр in Russian. Not sure whether it was used at the times of Gogol though.
I would love to see a conversation between you and some of the people over at Reason Magazine - people this piece describes so well.
Sir, i think you have just re-defined Wilsonianism as Panicism. Other than that I agree, these Wilsonian types are always the problem.
You do confuse empire with security and assume that America's safety hinges on perpetual intervention. It’s not “moral absolutism” to question entangling the U.S. in foreign conflicts with no constitutional declaration of war and no direct threat to the homeland; it’s basic republican principle. Strategic strikes, no matter how “limited,” invite retaliation, mission creep, and blowback, something libertarians learned the hard way from Bush’s wars, which this piece conveniently glosses over. What you label as “paralysis” is actually prudence. A government that can’t balance its own checkbook has no business playing world police.