Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sasha The Norwegian's avatar

The headline lured me in, but I feel that the article is missing a huge piece of the puzzle, which 'the long warred' alludes to in their comment. This article looks at the external factors, but I feel internal factors are missing. Yemeni politics are extremely complex, the tribe and tribal confederations play a huge part.

Without taking into account why the Houthis are able to maintain cohesion, any analysis will be missing a crucial part. Cohesion doesn't come from centralized command, it comes from trust, clear orders, strong deals between tribes, balanced tribal power - in some ways this started when the Zaydi royals were deposed in '62, they've been trying to take back power ever since, and by not including them in the larger national project the Sunni government sowed the seeds of the Houthi insurgency. Saudi interference hasn't helped.

The Houthis can't be defeated without taking into account what is a Houthi, why does the Houthi have strength, what does the Houthi want, and what can the Houthi offer the non-Houthi Yemenite.

The Houthis are a family/clan/tribe, with a long history, their initial fight was against mis-management by the government and Saudi interference.

Iran is a part of this for sure, and Iran is probably going to prioritize the Houthis over other aligned movements, because the Houthis give Iran something none of the others do - power over Saudi Arabia and the US.

While they're Iran aligned and allied, they're not puppets, and have shown pragmatism when needed, such as the 2025 war which resulted in a deal with the US - which Trump seems to want to adhere to.

I would also like to push back against the often used term "ragtag", often accompanied by "in flip flops" and so on. This tendency to use verbiage that implies they are disorganized, poorly supplied and poorly trained, prevents proper analysis and leads to underestimation of their strength and sophistication.

The term 'terrorist group' - while alarming, creates an image of a limited group of terrorists, not a cohesive, centrally controlled, army that can call on perhaps as many as 350 000 fighters (altho most are less trained that the core cadres, and may not be as ideological, they will follow their tribal elders and fight the Sunnis when asked).

You could use the same verbiage about the Afghans - a people who defeated three vast empires with access to all the most modern technology, and remain standing.

Their core armed leadership are sophisticated warriors, who know how to manage their tribal alliances and griefs, with access to a wide range of technologies that they know how to use.

These are hard men, from a hard land, and what they want is mostly to control their own country, which is also what the UAE aligned militias (STC) wanted (and still want, which is why SA pushed the UAE out). The fight is over which faction/clan should rule, along with the usual Sunni/Shiia divide, and opposition to Saleh's decades of corruption and mismanagement - all of which may, or may not, be overcome with clever leadership.

The internationally recognized govt in Yemen is run from hotel rooms in Riyadh, their policy more or less dictated by MBS. Their forces are not a cohesive Yemeni army, infighting, tribalism, factionalism and warring for positions, as well as the remote control from Saudi Arabia, reduces it's fighting strength. Simply put - Yemeni govt forces are not particularly loyal to the government for the most part, but to their clan/tribe and that tribal leader. It's an incredibly complex web of alliances, tribalism, personal connections and so on (as are SA's armed forces, which is why it may not be a great a fighting force as one may think).

As long as Saudi Arabia continues their heavy handed meddling, or downright dictation, this will continue.

I say this not to defend the Houthis, but to highlight that local conditions apply, and to warn against underestimating them, or overestimating what can be achieved with modern tech and sanctions. Without solving the under lying problem caused by SA and unification, there will be more fighting.

Trump could have prevented the fall of Mocha, but chose not to. The reasons why are not known, but the American are on record saying that there's no problem with oil, the US can supply everyone..

He's held to the 2025 deal, and CENTCOM is most likely running out of spare ammo that can be used against them, in addition to not wanting to provoke attacks on Red Sea shipping.

If the Houthis want to take Aden, and succeed, which seems likely without US intervention, then they will control the most populated areas, and of course, the Suez canal through their control of Bab a-Mandeb.

My assessment is that at this time, we may want to see if the Houthis are willing to take a pragmatic view of the world and mimic al-Sharaa - if they do, they may bring stability to country that has suffered immensely over the past decades.

By not taking SA's side we may prevent Twelver Shiism (from Iran) and Wahabbism (from SA) from taking over Yemen, which may, in the fullness of time, be for the better.

the long warred's avatar

Schelling doesn’t work - incremental escalation and “pressure “ and “raising the costs” doesn’t work. We tried this in Vietnam and abandoned it as this nonsense emboldened the enemy. Since 1945 American foreign policy has not understood that wars are not negotiations and business deals by other means. This has repeatedly led us into endemic conflict which we are completely unsuited for and exhausts our people’s support, not to mention breaks the military. In truth in that region one conflict is always replaced by another. Peace can only be imposed by overwhelming and ruthless force including what is now called genocide, we 🇺🇸 have no need nor stomach for such measures. We 🇺🇸 are inconvenienced, others more interested and not hampered (China) may ultimately take a hand. We 🇺🇸 have oil and China doesn’t.

We’re withdrawing. Morocco you know abuts the Atlantic and Europe, Yemen and the rest do not…

71 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?